NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 248, 248(1), 248(4), 252(3), 455 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, SECTION 252(1) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2103 AND RULE 7, 9 OF THE COMPANIES (COMPROMISES, ARRANGEMENTS AND AMALGAMATIONS) RULES, 2016
NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET KUMAR 8383098478 , 9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 , 9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Goodrich Global Furnishing India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Registrar Of Companies, Delhi And Ors, (2020) 07 NCLT CK 0028 NCLT allowed the appeal filed by the applicant, under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the name of the struck off company. While allowing the appeal NCLT held that the grounds contemplated under section 252 of Companies Act, 2013, namely, that of the company carrying on business or was in operation at the time of striking off its name, and where it appears "just" to the adjudicating authority that the name of the company is to be restored to the Register of Companies and the Section 252(3) f...